Reorg of D site

[Walter Bright]

Brad Roberts wrote:
> Would you consider adding "(alpha)" near any of the 2.0 references (such 
> as the header) so that it's clear that 2.0 is still a work in progress? 
>  Also, I'd really suggest moving the 1.0 docs back to the primary links 
> until 2.0 leaves alpha testing.
> 
> The downloads link/button at the top of the page leads to a non version 
> specific page, so it's questionable to have it inside /1.0/ or /2.0/. 
> Additionally, the versions listed on the page are both considerably out 
> of date (1.015 and 2.007).  Looks like there's a parenthesis mismatch on 
> the page as well.
> 
> Question, do you periodically mine the comments linked from every page 
> for things to fix / do?

Yes, but obviously I should do it more often.