Website changes/updates

[Walter Bright]

Unknown W. Brackets wrote:
> IMHO, the font size wasn't bad before.  Nice to have a larger one with 
> lots to read.  Just my opinion.
> 
> Also I suggest a line-height of 1.4em for the content.  This generally 
> makes large blocks of text (e.g. documentation, articles, blog posts) 
> easier to read.
> 
> Walter: if you're reading this, what are things you'd like to see the 
> website do?  Aside from possible comments, it's better to get a full 
> plan together (usually called the "discovery" phase) before jumping in 
> and making a mess.

I don't know, except that I don't want it to be an ongoing time sink.

Some goals:
1) easy to navigate
2) easy on the eyes
3) standards compliant
4) fast loading
5) printable with a print.css

Things to avoid:
1) glitz
2) fixed size pages
3) long download times
4) clever stuff that'll break with the next browser update

> I know you may not have time to worry about things like that.  In that 
> case, maybe you want to say so and let a group of people loose (e.g. +1 
> and -1'ing each other ideas) to give you a proposal of features and 
> suggestions.