Profiler, profiling DLLs, trace.log

[Lutger]

Bjoern wrote:

...
> I guess the numeric data at the bottom part are relevant. And each of
> them is calulated based on PART I.
> 
> How ? NONSENSE ?

iirc, the timings in part one are in ticks, not microseconds, while the
timings in the summary are calculated to be in microseconds. This is a bit
confusing. In the table of the second part the frequency is stated which
can be used to calculate from ticks to microseconds. 
 
> Last Q for the moment. What is PART I good for ? Or in other words, Can
> I use this information somehow ?

Call graphs. For each function, it tells you by which functions it is called
and which functions it calls, along with timing information. This can give
useful hints when looking for performance bottlenecks.