inlining

[Jarrett Billingsley]

"Bill Baxter" <dnewsgroup at billbaxter.com> wrote in message 
news:g5od1q$2v3b$3 at digitalmars.com...
> bobef wrote:
>> This has probably been asked many times before. If someone knows of such 
>> discussion please paste me a link. Why not an 'inline' attribute? We all 
>> know that the compiler can be stupid some times, and even if it is not 
>> people may want to inline something that is normally not appropriate for 
>> inlining. Auto inlining is fine, but people should have control over such 
>> kind of things I believe.
>
> Looking ahead, I think macro() will reduce the need for an inline 
> specifier.  Yeh, it won't be quite the same, but it'll be close enough 
> that making a separate inline keyword may not be worth it.
>
> --bb

Macros aren't coming until D3.