Omittable parens is an evil

[Jarrett Billingsley]

"Nick Sabalausky" <a at a.a> wrote in message 
news:g5tdll$2sjj$1 at digitalmars.com...

> I'm not sure if I'm completely following you here. Are you basically 
> saying that being able to call function foo by shortening "foo();" into 
> "foo;" confuses the issue of whether you're referring to the function 
> itself or actually trying to invoke it?

It's true!