RTest, a random testing framework

[Fawzi Mohamed]

On 2008-07-23 18:48:50 +0200, BCS <ao at pathlink.com> said:

> Reply to Fawzi,
> 
>> On 2008-07-23 00:54:49 +0200, BCS <ao at pathlink.com> said:
>> 
>>> Also the parse errors get better messages.
>>> 
>> well I spent some effort in making that better, if there is a syntax
>> error it caches it and writes your a message saying there is and
>> error,
>> your arguments and the core part of the generated mixin.
>> Not perfect, but much better than the default behavior.
> 
> the better thing about non string mixin code is that the error happens 
> at the point of the error, there is no way to tell where the string is 
> defined and generate an error there.

well I could get rid of the mixin for the manual init and force people 
to use typedefs, mmhh, first I will try to use it a little, than I will 
re-evaluate the decision.
For the exclusion of bad cases I think that the mixin is still the best 
solution, well actually an expression mixin would be better, but in 
D1.0...