Unofficial wish list status.(Jul 2008)

[Bruno Medeiros]

Sean Kelly wrote:
> 
> I suppose I should have been more clear.  Java is statically typed but
> dynamically bound.  Pretty uncommon for a pure OO language.
> 
> 
> Sean

There must be some misunderstanding here. Java is not dynamically bound, 
in the normal, general sense. The normal sense referring to the binding 
of *variables* of course.
Were you meaning that the binding of *classes* was dynamic? That is true 
of course, but one wouldn't call Java dynamically-bound because of that.

-- 
Bruno Medeiros - Software Developer, MSc. in CS/E graduate
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D