Ref (was Re: inlining)

[superdan]

Chris R. Miller Wrote:

> superdan wrote:
> > Chris R. Miller Wrote:
> > 
> >> JAnderson wrote:
> >>> superdan wrote:
> >>>> Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
> >>>>> Please don't take this as an attack, I'm not trying to make you feel 
> >>>>> like you're less of a member of the community.  Swearing on the 
> >>>>> internet just makes you seem like a 13-year-old boy. 
> >>> I'm glad I'm not the only one.
> >>>
> >>> In general I find it hard to read someone text if it has swearing all 
> >>> over it.  I generally ignore those emails as I feel they have no 
> >>> valuable content and they make me feel sick.  I don't want to be 
> >>> thinking about the bathroom while in technical discussions.
> >>>
> >>> If someone wants to be taken seriously they should try to at least 
> >>> communicate with proper edicate.
> >> Well if you're ______ity _____ cussing all the _____ time it makes your 
> >> _______ing messages so much _______ing longer it takes so ______ing long 
> >> to _______ing read them that I just _____ing ignore them.
> > 
> > did you mean "your"?
> 
> No, my grammar was correct.  You're = you are (contraction), your = you 
> (possessive).
> 
> Perhaps you'd like to go play the part of a Grammar Nazi with the other 
> guys on irc.freenode.net/##English ?

it was a legit question, einstein. i couldn't figure out what "____ity" means.

at any rate. if someone asks me to change my language, they'd be a lot more credible if they had theirs in good shape. cussing is a choice. "edicate" is ignorance.