Generic const - a non-functional view

[Leandro Lucarella]

Steven Schveighoffer, el 24 de junio a las 13:30 me escribiste:
> I understand that this proposal might be difficult to implement in the 
> compiler, and it might just be not worth the effort.  There are a lot of 
> problems that can be solved by not using const or using interfaces, instead 
> of these constructs.  However, this proposal represents what I think is the 
> most lenient and flexible proposal that is also const-correct from those I 
> have read, and allows for almost any const contract specification (excluding 
> head-const).  Whether it gets implemented or not, it was interesting to 
> think about how to solve all these problems, and I enjoyed the challenge.

I agree with this. I think it´s wonderful, well thought proposal, which
seems to address almost all the const issues in an elegant way, but I find
it a little too complex and hard to understand/explain to worth it
(besides the possible complex implementation).

But I think this proposal is very rich in terms of understanding the "const
problem" and things that can or can´t be done using const.

-- 
Leandro Lucarella (luca) | Blog colectivo: http://www.mazziblog.com.ar/blog/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145  104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SE CUMPLEN 1345 DIAS DESDE QUE NOS ROBARON NUESTRA CAMARA
	-- Crónica TV