synchronized { }

[Graham St Jack]

On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:15:24 -0400, Michel Fortin wrote:

> On 2008-06-25 21:18:41 -0400, Walter Bright <newshound1 at digitalmars.com>
> said:
> 
>> Right now, if you use a synchronized statement with no argument, it
>> will sync on a mutex unique to that statement.
>> 
>> Does anyone write threading code that depends on this behavior?
> 
> I've used it before, thinking it was equivalent to synchronize(this) {},
> an incorrect assumption obviously. If you get rid of it, I won't miss
> it.

Same.