synchronized { }

[torhu]

Sean Kelly wrote:
> == Quote from Graham St Jack (graham.stjack at internode.on.net)'s article
>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:15:24 -0400, Michel Fortin wrote:
>> > On 2008-06-25 21:18:41 -0400, Walter Bright <newshound1 at digitalmars.com>
>> > said:
>> >
>> >> Right now, if you use a synchronized statement with no argument, it
>> >> will sync on a mutex unique to that statement.
>> >>
>> >> Does anyone write threading code that depends on this behavior?
>> >
>> > I've used it before, thinking it was equivalent to synchronize(this) {},
>> > an incorrect assumption obviously. If you get rid of it, I won't miss
>> > it.
>> Same.
> 
> Um, it /is/ equivalent to synchronized(this).  What made you think differently?
> 

Don't the docs say that they're not equivalent?
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/statement.html#SynchronizedStatement

I thought they were the same too, before Walter checked in something to 
phobos that made me think otherwise.  Can't remember what exactly.