request for moderation

[anonymous]

I am glad you achieved balance,but here I do not think you are balanced.You offer legality to kris's personal attacks.

One thing from you I disagree:"I believe his hypocracy-crushing crusade is spewing shrapnel at many innocent bystanders and thus is creating a net-loss in the community atmosphere."You make this sounds like his so called crusade is in essence good,but only has a few side-effects.But it is not.It is not apropriate on this news group to acuse people of hypocrisy.And it is not apropriate to do personal attacks.You cause more harm because you offer kris the encouragment that he needs to continue his comportament.Evil actions are hard to justify so they thrive on others encouragment.

John Reimer Wrote:

> anon wrote:
> > John Reimer Wrote: another rehash of his kris apology . funniest thing about kretinis is his minions . posing as objective reasonable fellas ... a bit criticizing him ... patting him on the back ... always giving justification for his antics . john real friends dont let friends miss therapy.
> 
> Heh, so apparently I have a problem not being ruthless enough with 
> people in public, even when they deserve it...hmmm, that's good! :). 
> "Moderation" isn't the key after all, then, I suppose?
> 
> I most certainly will be careful what I say about anybody in this 
> newsgroup, friend or no friend.  Thus, my critical assessment of kris 
> (though, honestly, I'm surprised you thought it to be justifying him -- 
> I thought I was kinda harsh on the guy; I must have succeeded in 
> achieving some balance! yay! :) ).
> 
> -JJR