Range Type

[Janice Caron]

On 24/03/2008, Craig Black <cblack at ara.com> wrote:
> I could be wrong, but I don't think this would be a big deal.  The .. would
>  be interpreted differently when preceded by a type.  The .. would work like
>  [].

I don't think it would, because ".." is an infix operator, whereas
"[]" is a postfix operator.

That said, it's no big deal. If we're arguing about /syntax/, I guess
that mean we're not really disputing the /idea/. So I'm happy to let
Walter worry about the syntax.