const debacle

[Davidson Corry]

Janice Caron wrote:
> On 26/03/2008, Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> "Janice Caron" wrote
>>
>>  Your way of explaining how the resolution of inout works as 3 separate
>>  function bindings is good for understanding purposes.  I'd amend my rules to
>>  be similar:
> 
> I've just figured out an /even easier/ way of describing this. I've
> got it down to just two rules now.
> 	[elided for brevity, go read Janice's original message]
> I like keeping the explanations simple! :-)

That is lovely, Janice. Nice work!

-- Dai