version'ing issue
Mike Parker
aldacron71 at yahoo.com
Sat Mar 29 22:07:27 PDT 2008
Koroskin Denis wrote:
> This won't compile under D 1.x:
>
> class SomeClass
> {
> version( D_Version2 )
> {
> invariant void someMethod()
> {
> }
> } else {
> const void someMethod()
> {
> }
> }
> }
>
> int main()
> {
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> Maybe 'version'ing should be less restrictive on syntax so that backward
> compatibility could still be possible.
> Now I'm a little stuck with porting code from D2.012 to D1.028.
>
> Or should we just choose one version and stick with it?
What I'd like to see is a special case for language versions, such as
with debug:
debug {
blah blah
}
So we could do something like:
D_Version2 {
blah blah
}
These blocks would only be parsed if the compiler conforms to that
version of the spec or later.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list