U++ Core vs D programming language
janderson
askme at me.com
Thu May 1 08:17:28 PDT 2008
Jason House wrote:
> Poking around the U++ web site, I spotted this page:
> http://www.ultimatepp.org/www$uppweb$vsd$en-us.html
>
> It says "C++ is still well ahead of D (by 70%) if not being hold back by standard library design and average implementation..."
>
> Since Walter is very proud of D's strings, I wonder if this'll get any attention. They use 64 bit gdc for their speed test. I guess they're using D1 even though they link to a D2 page...
It looks like the implementations are different (more then just by
language). Also I wonder how much of the time is spent in the writefln.
-Joel
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list