More D newb questions.

[Michiel Helvensteijn]

Me Here wrote:

> But C doesn't have ~ concatenation, so there's
> no backwards compatibilty reason for not defining opCat for chars to do
> the only logical thing and produce a char[].

What if you tried to concatenate two types that DO support concatenation of
their own?

You're suggesting the concatenation operator could work like this:

operator~: T x T -> T[]

If T is already an array, however, you wouldn't want those semantics. Would
you have it work only on primitive types? That would make it a very
inconsistent behavior and I'd rather see the error than have D guess that I
need an array.

-- 
Michiel