why ; ?

[Joel C. Salomon]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
> Yigal Chripun wrote:
>> on the contrary, I've seen an article online of two people that did
>> exactly that. they defined an alternative syntax for C++ which is both
>> consistent and preserves the semantics of c++. it was their Thesis or
>> something like that. just stumbled on it via google.
> 
> Link?

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Significantly_Prettier_and_Easier_C++_Syntax>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFILD6UzLx4GzBL9dYRAjMrAJ9WiMCBA5qUswzHBhtypOwSjfdxrgCgzIbN
vln72iicI3pFCgpDIyD4th8=
=BGPP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----