Why we chose not to use D for our Linux project

[Ty Tower]

Neal Alexander Wrote:

> Chris R. Miller wrote:
> > Ty Tower Wrote:
> > 
> >> Lars Ivar Igesund Wrote:
> >>>> Don't start on me ! I am 
> >>>> still here and contributing with posts wherever I see stupidity, 
> >>> Contributing more stupidity?
> >> Now you see Lars here be your way, and your error.
> >> Attack the messenger and ignore the message 
> >> We all fall into it from time to time but you do it regularly whenever someone says anything negative.
> >>
> >> What happens then is no-one dare give you a message for fear of ridicule and being on your high horse you influence others with your view .
> >> So if its OK for you to do it ,it will be acceptable for others and this permeates down to other forum members and nothing gets fixed 
> >>
> >> This is how it is with D now . You could fix it simply by a small change to  your approach and attitude. If you assume directness is rudeness you are very wrong.
> > 
> > I wise man speaks of what he sees.  The easiest approach to communication in a newsgroup, forum, or mailing list is a simple loop:
> > 
> > 1) State what you see.
> > 2) State what you think.
> > 3) (optional) State what you ****think**** should change.
> > 4) Goto: 1
> > 
> > Ty sees a resistence to change.  He thinks that this is making D a harder language for new people to get into.  He thinks that people should start taking criticism less personally and more like contstructive criticism.
> > 
> > I see no reason for animosity here.
> > 
> I don't see how you can take a person who has conversations with 
> themselves (under different aliases) seriously.
> 
> Especially when all the multiple personalities are douchebags haha.

Cant give a reasonable argument so go with the name calling. If you think this is the case prove it ?