C++ traps that D2 doesn't avoid yet?

[Walter Bright]

bearophile wrote:
> This page lists a lot of C++ traps and pitfalls in a short space. I
> assume D has to avoid or render meaningless a quite high percentage
> of them. I'd like to list what of them D2 doesn't improve/fix yet,
> but my limited knowledge of C++ lets me understand only a certain
> percentage of such list of items (probably less than 75%) so probably
> I am not qualified yet to compare that with the D situation. Later I
> may try to write such differential list anyway...
> 
> http://www.johndeacon.net/Cpp/trapsAndPitfalls.asp

At a glance, D does resolve a lot of them. But preparing a detailed 
response to his list is many hours of work.