std.math.poly and const
Denis Koroskin
2korden at gmail.com
Sat Nov 29 11:53:59 PST 2008
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 08:22:34 +0300, Walter Bright
<newshound1 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> dsimcha wrote:
>> Should the function signature of std.math.poly be (real x, const real[]
>> A),
>> not (real x, real[] A)? The D code at the end of the function clearly
>> doesn't
>> modify A, but I have no idea what the ASM code is doing. Is this a bug?
>
> Yes, it should be const.
crc32 module also needs to be updated. Not only it doesn't use const (but
should, it allows compile-time crc32 evaluation), but it also uses char[]
instead of string! :)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list