Positive

[Alexander Pánek]

Walter Bright wrote:
> Sean Kelly wrote:
>> Is there anything this change in syntax gives us over what we 
>> currently have?  If not, I don't want it.
> 
> It's purely aesthetic. There are no technical advantages of one over the 
> other.

“T!()” just works. There’s no other meaning to it than template 
instantiation, whereas ”.” is heavily used as member accessor. I don’t 
see any technical or even aesthetical advantages here that might help 
understanding code. I just don’t get it.