dropping parentheses on template instantiation
Tom S
h3r3tic at remove.mat.uni.torun.pl
Sun Oct 5 11:47:39 PDT 2008
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I just realized something different. After making an informal review of
> some code, I saw that a large percentage of template instantiations only
> need ONE argument.
>
> This makes me think, with the old "!" notation, parentheses could be
> dropped entirely without prejudice:
>
> auto covariance = Matrix!real(n, n);
> auto normalized = SparseVector!double(n);
>
> and so on.
>
> To the unbridled joy of the enemies of the Sad Pirate, the dot won't
> work for template instantiation because without the parentheses it DOES
> engender ambiguity.
>
> Now say we take the following route:
>
> 1) We find something different from shouting
>
> 2) We drop the parentheses for 1 argument
>
> That sounds like a possible winner. In this case the "#" becomes
> considerably more attractive, in fact very attractive exactly because it
> looks unlike any letter:
>
> auto covariance = Matrix#real(n, n);
> auto normalized = SparseVector#double(n);
>
> Ideas?
Skip 1) and a lot of folks will be happy with 2) !!!!!112 /* just to
trigger your phobia */
--
Tomasz Stachowiak
http://h3.team0xf.com/
h3/h3r3tic on #D freenode
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list