foo!(bar) ==> foo{bar}

[Walter Bright]

Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> I would like to eventually be able to have a function like this (trivial 
> contrived example):
> 
> repeat(int times, void delegate() d)
> {
>     foreach(int i; 0..times)
>         d();
> }
> 
> And call it like this:
> 
> repeat(3)
> {
>     // Do stuff
> }
> 
> Instead of needing to use the current awkwardness of:
> 
> repeat(3,
> {
>     // Do stuff
> });
> 
> If changing "foo!(bar)" to "foo{bar}" would cause problems with that, then 
> I'd be against it. Otherwise, I'd be ok with the change, provided that it 
> didn't end up becoming visually confusing in terms of "Is that a big 
> template parameter list, or a statement block?" 

It may be a problem, because inside a template expansion, the template 
name with no arguments represents the current instantiation.