shouting versus dotting
Don
nospam at nospam.com.au
Tue Oct 7 07:25:08 PDT 2008
Janderson wrote:
>
> Personally I don't think that we should just change the symbol ! to .
> because it will break a load of libraries for purely an ascetic change.
> Its difficult to argue that . is better then ! as it depends on the
> person reading the code. However if a template change allows for more
> functionality then it might be worth considering.
>
> Anyway extending a previous suggestion. What about using ;?
>
> Foo(int T, alias X; T val, X val2);
>
>
> One clash I can think of is that it might get mixup with a for loop,
> however I imagine that's easily detectable. Also its slightly harder to
> make a distinction between the template args and the value however on
> the positive side its less typing.
>
> -Joel
This is the first suggestion which really interests me. It's really
short, and there is some precedent for the use of ; as a separator from
for/foreach.
But what do you do for non-function templates, which is really the
problem case? I think you end up with a bunch of ;);), which maybe looks
a bit odd.
auto v = new Vector!(Stack!(Tuple!(Positive!(real), Matrix!(real))))(3, 3));
becomes:
auto v = new Vector(Stack(Tuple(Positive(real), Matrix(real;););); 3, 3);
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list