foo!(bar) ==> foo{bar}

[Tomas Lindquist Olsen]

Denis Koroskin wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:40:15 +0400, ore-sama <spam at here.lot> wrote:
> 
>> Walter Bright Wrote:
>>
>>> The foo.(bar) syntax seems to be sinking. The foo{bar} seems to be the
>>> most practical alternative. So, how about putting it in the next D2
>>> release on a trial basis, so people can try it out and see how it looks?
>>
>> How about struct initializers syntax? I don't know what are you 
>> planning to do with it, Lars proposed to use curly braces. This can 
>> interfere (a little) with template instantiation syntax.
> 
> Yeah, dropping the q{} stuff opens the way to initialize struct using 
> StructName{ ... } syntax:
> http://www.digitalmars.com/pnews/read.php?server=news.digitalmars.com&group=digitalmars.D.announce&artnum=12862 
> 

Funny thing is the argument with conflicting with q{} was used extensively during that 
discussion, now it's somehow become a non issue.