foo!(bar) ==> foo{bar}

[Alexander Pánek]

Tiago Carvalho wrote:
> "Alexander Pánek" <alexander.panek at brainsware.org> wrote in message 
> news:gcgom3$28pm$1 at digitalmars.com...
>> Top posting is bad!
> 
> Ups... :/

It’s ok. ;)

>> Tiago Carvalho wrote:
>>> Not beeing a very active template programmer I find the @ version the 
>>> easiest on the eyes (since it appears there's no technical 
>>> differences from !() ). Both in template@( int, float ) and the 
>>> single type template at int suggested by Andre.
>>
>> But since !() is established and used for *years* now, I don’t see a 
>> point in changing it, just because something else might be easier on 
>> the eyes for some people.
> 
> I understand, I have been following the D development for a while now 
> but still not a very active D programmer, so it's easier for me to agree 
> with changes to the language.
> I'm happy not to be in Walter's shoes since there's no right answer for 
> this, at least not one that I can see. But since it seems there's a 
> strong will to change the !() "standard"; in that case I like the @.

Where did you see that strong will? Mind to introduce us?