Top 5
Andrei Alexandrescu
SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Thu Oct 9 07:12:46 PDT 2008
Don wrote:
> Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> "Benji Smith" wrote
>>> Gide Nwawudu wrote:
>>>> 2) Finalise const/invariant stuff and change manifest const from
>>>> 'enum' to 'define' (or whatever).
>>>>
>>>> define {
>>>> double PI = 3.14;
>>>> string author = "Walter";
>>>> }
>>>> define enum Direction { North, South, East, West };
>>> I've never quite understood what people are talking about when they
>>> refer to a "manifest" constant. What does that mean?
>>>
>>> And why do we need any special keyword? What does the "define"
>>> keyword give you that an ordinary variable declaration doesn't? Why
>>> not just write the code from above like this:
>>>
>>> double PI = 3.14;
>>> string author = "Walter";
>>> enum Direction { North, South, East, West };
>>>
>>> What am I missing here?
>>
>> You cannot take the address of a manifest constant, and it doesn't
>> live in a static data space or in memory anywhere. Instead it is
>> built directly into the code.
>>
>> So when you say
>>
>> define double PI = 3.14;
>>
>> And then use PI:
>>
>> auto x = PI;
>>
>> This generates code that declares a variable x, then assigns it to
>> 3.14. the PI symbol isn't stored in the final code.
>>
>> This has a huge benefit when you are declaring lots of constants, but
>> only few will be used. You don't have to pay the penalty of storing
>> all the constants in your code, only the ones you use, and only where
>> you use them.
>
> Actually a smart linker would do that anyway. The only reason we need
> manifest constants is because OPTLINK isn't smart enough.
> (And DMD isn't smart enough to discard unreachable variables from the
> symbol table).
Exactly so.
Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list