backporting features to D1

[Derek Parnell]

On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 12:54:47 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:

> bobef wrote:
>> category 3) will be forced to break their code because
>> once D2 is declared stable D1 will probably be declared deprecated
> 
> No, I intend to support D1 as long as there is interest in it.

I'm no longer using D at all. I've lost interest in D1 as D2 looks to be
much, much better. However D2 is a currently whirlwind of uncertainty. I'd
love to use some parts of Tango but not D1. I like Phobos (but admit it
still has too many warts and omissions) but D2 is just not worth my time
yet. I tried coding in D2 but a lot of that code is going to need
significant rework when the cabal have finalized their deliberations, which
look like being at least 12 months away.

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
skype: derek.j.parnell