Uniform syntax for templates (second try)

[Sergey Gromov]

Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:15:59 -0500,
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Anyhow, it would be great if more people added to this exchange 
> to get a feel of the level of interest.

I admit I felt disappointed a couple of times when I wasn't able to use 
some is() tricks in a template type list.  If that's fixed then I'm fine 
with the rest of the syntax.

Unconditional type decomposition sounds useful.