Is it time for D 3.0?

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Derek Parnell wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:35:45 -0400, Paul D. Anderson wrote:
> 
>> I posted this comment already in the phobos/tango thread but I thought it might be of more general interest.
>>
>> With all the changes being discussed -- many of the breaking changes -- is it time to move on to D version 3.0?
>>
>> It seems to me a natural division exists between 2.0, when we had to choose between tango and phobos; and 3.0, when we got to use them both.
>>
>> Some of the other recent discussions here, template syntax, for example, could fall on the other side of the 2.0/3.0 divide.
>>
>> I'm sure Walter and others have discussed when and how the move to 3.0 will occur. Just wondering if this important change should be a factor.
> 
> There is a sort of precedent. Windows 1.0 was a proof-of-concept edition,
> Windows 2.0 was forgettable, and it was not until Windows 3.0 that is
> became usable. 

Wouldn't mind if those involved would make comparable amounts of money :o).

Andrei