Phobos/Tango Unification Plans

[John Reimer]

Hello Paul,

> Benji Smith Wrote:
> 
>> Walter Bright wrote:
>> 
>>> Benji Smith wrote:
>>> 
>>>> John Reimer wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Yep, probably best just to be content with the druntime for now...
>>>>> that's a big move in itself ... and a great one.  If we demand too
>>>>> much of these guys, they are gonna balk. :-D
>>>>> 
> If these changes (and others discussed here lately) are going to break
> a lot of code, is it time to move to 3.0?
>


I think that just "ups" the complexity.  You may have just made a whole bunch 
of people faint with that suggestion. :-D

But I'm assuming you are suggesting that "3.0" respresent the merge of Phobos 
and Tango?  If that's the case, I don't think there need be an incremental 
version value to represent the change.

-JJR