[OT] Retreating from Iraq
BCS
ao at pathlink.com
Mon Oct 13 16:05:43 PDT 2008
Reply to Andrei,
> BCS wrote:
>
>> Reply to Benji,
>>
>>> BCS wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Sort everyone under you (directly or indirectly) <<<<<
>>>>> by the number of
>>>>> subordinates they have. Pick the subordinate with the most
>>>>> subordinates and call the next man in line to them. remove every
>>>>> subordinate down that chain of command and repeat.
>>>>> This assumes that the depth of command is more or less the same
>>>>> across the board.
>>>>>
>>>> This is based on the ssumption that the people with the most
>>>> subordinates need to get started first.
>>>>
>>> But consider this case...
>>>
>>> I have two subordinates: Dirk and Deek. Dirk has only one
>>> subordinate of his own, but Deek has three. It seems like I should
>>> call Deek first.
>>>
>>> But what if Dirk's single subordinate has twenty subordinates of his
>>> own, which Deek's subordinates are leaf-nodes? In that case, it
>>> makes a whole lot more sense to call Dirk first.
>>>
>> my solution does exactly that. It first calls the commander, however
>> removed, from whoever has the most subordinates. Assuming that each
>> call take the same amount of time, the man with the most subordinates
>> will be the first man at his rank to get the order.
>>
> Define subordinate.
>
> Andrei
>
1 step down
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list