Is it time for D 3.0?

[Paul D. Anderson]

Jason House Wrote:

> Paul D. Anderson Wrote:
> 
> > I posted this comment already in the phobos/tango thread but I thought it might be of more general interest.
> > 
> > With all the changes being discussed -- many of the breaking changes -- is it time to move on to D version 3.0?
> > 
> > It seems to me a natural division exists between 2.0, when we had to choose between tango and phobos; and 3.0, when we got to use them both.
> > 
> > Some of the other recent discussions here, template syntax, for example, could fall on the other side of the 2.0/3.0 divide.
> > 
> > I'm sure Walter and others have discussed when and how the move to 3.0 will occur. Just wondering if this important change should be a factor.
> > 
> > Paul
> 
> I'd hate to see D2 be permanently anti-tango, especially since Tango developers favor a stable language. I'd prefer to see druntime, the fix to dynamic closures, etc in D2

Good point. I think you're right.