Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> Ary Borenszweig wrote:
>> Now that you mention it, making template syntax be !() or {} makes it
>> harder to port C++ code to D. I wonder why this isn't a big deal, but
>> keeping "int[3]*[5] x;"-like declarations is a must... :-(
>>
>
> Didn't you mean the C-style declarations (ie, "int (*x[5])[3];") ?
>
Yes, that.