backporting features to D1

[Leandro Lucarella]

Walter Bright, el 11 de octubre a las 12:51 me escribiste:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
> >But features that have
> >been tested in D2 and which are backwards compatible with D1?  Why
> >would anyone be against those?
> 
> Because then you lose the definition of what is D 1.0. I believe there is 
> considerable value not only in a stable compiler, but a stable language 
> definition.

What's wrong with calling this new language D 1.1 for example?

Again, did you ever saw how Python evolves? Really, it's really good.

-- 
Leandro Lucarella (luca) | Blog colectivo: http://www.mazziblog.com.ar/blog/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145  104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
they wrap me up in the back of the trunk
packed with foam and blind drunk
they won't ever take me alive
cause they all drive killer cars