Getting module of a class

[Gregor Richards]

Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Bill Baxter <wbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> The reason is this:  these days it's en vogue to make classes contain
>> as few functions as necessary, and to write everything else as
>> non-member functions.
> 
> OT: is it?  What's this "model" called?  "Oh, C was right after all"?  ;)
> 
> What are the supposed advantages of developing like this?

Sounds like a poor impersonation of aspect-oriented programming, maybe 
the idea is to make memberish functions not actually be members so that 
other imports can write memberish functions that are as "1st-class". 
Sort of ridiculous though.

  - Gregor Richards