evolution
Bill Baxter
wbaxter at gmail.com
Sun Oct 19 02:04:11 PDT 2008
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 3:17 PM, ore-sama <spam at here.lot> wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
>
>> Walter suggested that I move the
>> old modules in etc/, so changing e.g. std.algorithm to etc.algorithm
>> should make legacy code work.
A nicer way to do it would be to make it all deprecated (but still
operational) in one release, then replace it in the next release.
> may be std.old.*?
I like that better than etc.
Maybe even std.deprecate.*
Or
std_deprecated.*
(I think a package name can't be a keyword, right? If it could then
I'd say std.deprecated.*)
I don't like etc though -- it doesn't imply to me at all that the
stuff inside it would be old and deprecated.
--bb
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list