Invariant -- question #2
Max Samukha
samukha at voliacable.com.removethis
Tue Oct 21 10:54:05 PDT 2008
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:46:47 -0200, Ary Borenszweig
<ary at esperanto.org.ar> wrote:
>Denis Koroskin wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:18:22 +0400, Ary Borenszweig
>> <ary at esperanto.org.ar> wrote:
>>
>>> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Lars Ivar Igesund
>>>> <larsivar at igesund.net> wrote:
>>>>> It was changed when invariant was introduced to D2 as to make a
>>>>> transition
>>>>> path ... I think it was announced too.
>>>> I can't find anything about it in the changelog, but maybe it was
>>>> buried in the newsgroups somewhere. W has a habit of not announcing
>>>> important changes until three months later when he mentions it in
>>>> passing in a reply as if everyone knew about it.
>>>
>>> Does anyone know about
>>>
>>> =this() {
>>> }
>>>
>>> ?
>>
>> Looks like a new/alternative syntax for struct postblitting (works in
>> DMD2.019, too).
>
>Yes, it's exactly that, but I didn't see it announced anywhere.
Isn't it aesthetically repulsive? :)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list