foo!(bar) ==> foo{bar} ==> foo[bar] (just Brackets)

Ary Borenszweig ary at esperanto.org.ar
Tue Oct 21 15:26:14 PDT 2008


Steven Schveighoffer escribió:
> "Ary Borenszweig" wrote
>> Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>>> "Bruno Medeiros" wrote
>>>> Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>>>>> So I would be forced to get an IDE to work (which I have tried several 
>>>>> now without success).
>>>>>
>>>> Also what IDEs did you try, and what problems exactly did you encounter? 
>>>> Did you try any of the Eclipse ones, Descent or Mmrnmhrm?
>>> I tried Descent and Code::Blocks.
>>>
>>> I wanted something to try and debug programs.  But I couldn't get either 
>>> of them to hook to dmd for compiling projects.  Descent actually has you 
>>> configure a compiler, and can run a compilation which does absolutely 
>>> nothing.  I found out later that it only uses the configuration from the 
>>> compiler, it doesn't actually *use* the compiler.
>> Did you try this:
>>
>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/descent/wiki/CompilingPrograms
> 
> Yes.  I believe I did follow those directions, but the debugger 
> automatically skipped through extern(C) functions, and since I was trying to 
> debug the runtime, it wasn't useful.
> 
> But I don't think the files were being compiled correctly, as the debugger 
> couldn't find the source for the library code anyways.
> 
> I'm not saying that Descent is bad, I'm just saying it's too rough at the 
> moment for someone like me who doesn't have patience with IDEs ;)  I'm sure 
> you'll get the kinks worked out someday.  The auto-completion is really 
> cool, but not worth the effort for me.  Vim's working just fine for me right 
> now.

And what about Mmrnmhrm?

> 
>> The compiler configuration will be gone soon, as it isn't used for 
>> anything.
> 
> That is good, it was very confusing ;)
> 
>> And compiler integration, hmmm... it's taking too long, and I guess it's 
>> because me and Robert are way too busy/lazy lately.
> 
> I understand that.
> 
>> But if you compile programs like it is said there, the debugger 
>> integration works quite well.
> 
> Have you solved being able to debug extern(C) functions?  ddbg has no 
> problem debugging them.

Yeah, I didn't have time to see it...

> 
> -Steve 
> 
> 



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list