Invariant -- question #2

KennyTM~ kennytm at gmail.com
Wed Oct 22 07:28:44 PDT 2008


Bill Baxter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Bruno Medeiros
> <brunodomedeiros+spam at com.gmail> wrote:
>> Ary Borenszweig wrote:
>>> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Lars Ivar Igesund
>>>> <larsivar at igesund.net> wrote:
>>>>> It was changed when invariant was introduced to D2 as to make a
>>>>> transition
>>>>> path ... I think it was announced too.
>>>> I can't find anything about it in the changelog, but maybe it was
>>>> buried in the newsgroups somewhere.  W has a habit of not announcing
>>>> important changes until three months later when he mentions it in
>>>> passing in a reply as if everyone knew about it.
>>> Does anyone know about
>>>
>>> =this() {
>>> }
>>>
>>> ?
>> I read diffs of the DDoc with each new D2 release, and it wasn't mentioned
>> there, so it was probably unreleased, yeah. I wouldn't be surprised if there
>> was more stuff like that. :P
> 
> That reminds me ... the foo.(bar) template instantation syntax was
> supposedly already implemented.  I wonder if that's snuck into this
> release too?
> 
> --bb
No.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list