Dynamic Closure + Lazy Arguments = Performance Killer?
Jason House
jason.james.house at gmail.com
Fri Oct 24 14:32:48 PDT 2008
I ported some monte carlo simulation code from Java to D2, and performance is horrible.
34% of the execution time is used by std.random.uniform. To my great surprise, 25% of the execution time is memory allocation (and collection) from that random call. The only candidate source I see is a call to ensure with lazy arguments. The memory allocation occurs at the start of the UniformDistribution call. I assume this is dynamic closure kicking in.
Can anyone verify that this is the case?
600000 memory allocations per second really kills performance!
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list