Unicode operators

[Bent Rasmussen]

Agreed.

As an example: what domain does not include boolean expressions? And how 
many domains include vector and matrix operations? Quite many.

It would be a massive boost for readability in those domains (and in all 
domains, with boolean expressions).

The problem is not the operators themselves; a language does not loose 
anything by extension, it is how exactly to best arrive at the goal of 
having the code look nice and readable with those operators.

- Bent

Hm, anyone fancy the |> operator?


"Moritz Warning" <moritzwarning at web.de> skrev i meddelelsen 
news:gdoekc$1f5o$4 at digitalmars.com...
> Unicode operators would be nice addition to D.
>
> Since it's common to have opFooBar style operators overloads in D,
> I would like to rise the question what unicode operators do users need
> (most) or would like to have?
>
> opDotProduct and opCrossProduct would be definitely cool.