Unicode operators

[Bill Baxter]

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
<SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Bent Rasmussen
>> <IncredibleShrinkingSphere at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Agreed.
>>>
>>> As an example: what domain does not include boolean expressions? And how
>>> many domains include vector and matrix operations? Quite many.
>>
>>> It would be a massive boost for readability in those domains (and in all
>>> domains, with boolean expressions).
>>
>> I don't know about you, but to me 'and' and 'or' make for much more
>> readable boolean expressions than the standard mathematical symbols ^
>> and v.  Heck, && and || are more readable to me than the math symbols.
>
> Hm, in my experimental emacs shenanigans I had && displayed as a wedge and
> || displayed as a vee and heck do they look good.

Hmm.  I guess it's just because I've spent a lot more time looking at
the C operators than the math ones.

--bb