narrowed down the problem area [naked asm]

[Don]

Walter Bright wrote:
> Don wrote:
>> Why use 'naked' at all, then?
>> (1) so that you can use the EBP register;
>> (2) because non-naked asm doesn't work properly, either. If you pass 
>> an array into an asm function, you can't get the ".ptr" part of it, 
>> because the "ptr" conflicts with the asm "ptr" keyword. This is a big 
>> problem, since almost all asm functions that I write work on arrays.
> 
> (3) you want to write the entire function in assembler.

I think it probably should be illegal to include any non-asm code in a 
function containing naked asm. It would certainly make the spec simpler!
In fact, I don't see how any other approach is really possible.