A suggestion to D commulity 2

[Saaa]

"Rayne" <DiscipleRayne at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:gaqtb1$855$1 at digitalmars.com...
> Yonggang Luo Wrote:
>
>> It's seems that most hard things to geting Phobos and Tango working 
>> together is that the "object.d" is different. Because everything is 
>> derived from "object.d", so if we want to geting Phobos and Tango working 
>> together, we must do a hudge refactoring. But we have to do, because of 
>> Phobos and Tango will be larger and larger. And there is such a day, we 
>> must geting Phobos and Tango working together, it's be a very hard thing 
>> to do.
>>
>> And we have another choice, that give up Phobos or Tango, leave one 
>> library as the stardard! But i think this would be harder.
>
> Your starting to get annoying with this "have to do" this "have to do" 
> that bullshit, no one has to do anything there is no real big reason to 
> make them compatible with each other, if it's not important and it's not 
> no one is going to care.

Having one library would be easier.

>
> And there is a standard libary already, phobos,
I agree.

>why discontinue tangos because it's the standard?
As I read it he is stating that it is a possibility to drop one of the two 
libraries.

>Simply because you don't want to be tempted into using tango?
I read no preference for phobos in the post.

>Your really not making any sense.
He thinks that merging two libraries together will become harder the larger 
they become.