Smooth transition to D2 for Tango users?
Sean Kelly
sean at invisibleduck.org
Mon Sep 22 18:10:51 PDT 2008
Sergey Gromov wrote:
> Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> oops, D1 doesn't support that type of enum ;)
>
> I think you've got the idea. The code
>
> version (D_Version2)
> {
> mixin("some very specific code");
> }
>
> works in any version of D, current or future.
String mixins don't work directly for everything though. If you want to
change a return value from non-const to const, for example, you need to
make an alias for it using a versioned string mixin and then use the
alias in the function declaration. And then there are things like this:
// D1
const x = "hello";
// D2
enum x = "hello";
With string mixins you end up having to duplicate the entire line, and
this can be a disaster if you're trying to maintain large header files
with tons of declarations.
Finally, I think the version(D_Version2) idea is backwards. It should
be version(D_Version1). The current method isn't forwards-compatible,
so all the code with these version statements in it will break when we
get D version 3.
Sean
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list