D vs Java as a first programming language
Chad J
gamerchad at __spam.is.bad__gmail.com
Mon Sep 29 19:38:13 PDT 2008
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "dsimcha" <dsimcha at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:gbrvb5$cdt$1 at digitalmars.com...
>> == Quote from Christopher Wright (dhasenan at gmail.com)'s article
>>> Sean Kelly wrote:
>>>> The typical approach to this tends to be "just put this stuff in the
>>>> file and ignore it--I'll explain it later. I never understood why this
>>>> is considered a good teaching method :-)
>>> Because it lets you create toys without understanding, and thus gets you
>>> interested without you expending significant effort.
>> Agreed, though I wouldn't necessarily phrase it in a way that smacks of
>> intellectual laziness. Personally, I've always felt that I learn much
>> more
>> quickly and much more thoroughly when I get to try to do something
>> (preferably
>> useful) with my new knowledge as I'm learning, even if my understanding is
>> fairly
>> shaky, rather than being forced to learn all the
>> minutiae/background/theory before
>> trying to use any of what I've learned. For example, I would *never* read
>> a book
>> about a new programming language cover to cover before trying to write
>> something
>> in it. I would probably skim the first chapter or two, try to do a
>> project in it,
>> use the book as a reference, and then read the book cover to cover later
>> to learn
>> some better ways of doing things after I'd gotten my hands dirty a little.
>>
>> I feel that once I've actually tried to use a new piece of knowledge, I
>> have a
>> *much* better idea of what, specifically, I still don't get, and can ask
>> much more
>> intelligent questions than if I'm forced to learn large amounts of stuff
>> passively
>> from lectures/books before getting my hands dirty with any of it.
>> Furthermore,
>> learning this way also makes it much easier for me to see how things fit
>> into the
>> bigger picture. Not sure if this is universal, or just a personal
>> preference.
>
> I'm not sure if that's universal either, but I suspect that it is (excapt
> maybe for some rare fringe cases). At the very least, I can say that my mind
> works that way too.
>
>
Same.
I don't even use books very much, if at all.
Examples + reference material + experience. It seems to be my killer
strategy.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list