rename this to ctor
davidl
davidl at 126.com
Wed Apr 1 07:17:33 PDT 2009
在 Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:04:09 +0800,Christian Kamm
<kamm-incasoftware at shiftatleftanddelete.de> 写道:
> davidl Wrote:
>> Yeah, all the merits of ctor just outweigh its demerits. The only
>> demerit
>> of it is taking "ctor" to join the keyword list, However it also bans
>> people from using ctor as a var( it might be positive! )
>
> If you make ctor a keyword that doesn't behave like an identifier almost
> everywhere, I fear you'll just replace 'this' by 'ctor' without much
> benefit. I can't see a good reason for the constructor function name to
> be a keyword. Maybe something like opCtor or opConstruct would fit
> better with the existing special functions though.
>
Oh, right, you are pushing it further bit than I ;) I totally agree with
you.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list