Contract programming syntax

[Jarrett Billingsley]

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Don <nospam at nospam.com> wrote:
> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Christopher Wright <dhasenan at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Or just your style guide. But even if you can demonstrate significant
>>> benefits (and I don't see any benefits, really), inertia is against you.
>>> I
>>> don't think Walter would change it for anything but extreme provocation.
>>
>> Are you suggesting an "offer he can't refuse"?  ;)
>
> With the pressure to reduce the number of keywords in D, body is the most
> obvious candidate. It's identical to /*body*/ as far as I can tell.

Oh.  I was kind of thinking a horse head in his bed.